The link above does not speak about different cancer funds. It simply shows that cancer patients without insurance just die.
That is obviously how it works without universal medical care; sick people don't just magically get better with magic money like a sitcom. They die.
But there are large funds for breast and cervical cancer and that is obviously very good.
Unfortunately there are not for rectal or colon cancer. Maybe because no one is going to run 10k for rectal cancer, maybe because it's too dirty a word to say on tv.
Either way, if you're poor, be sure to get the right cancer.
Or just fix your medical system.
Now if you'll pardon me I must take a break and let the dittoheads and digg-patriots catch up with downvoting all my posts.
This reply is sophomoric. Its thesis is "sick people don't just magically get better with magic money like a sitcom. They die." But that's self-evidently not true; when an indigent patient has a heart attack and arrives in the emergency room, they are treated. It's not "magic money" that saves them; there is an actual pool of resources that they draw from.
That is obviously how it works without universal medical care; sick people don't just magically get better with magic money like a sitcom. They die.
But there are large funds for breast and cervical cancer and that is obviously very good. Unfortunately there are not for rectal or colon cancer. Maybe because no one is going to run 10k for rectal cancer, maybe because it's too dirty a word to say on tv.
Either way, if you're poor, be sure to get the right cancer.
Or just fix your medical system.
Now if you'll pardon me I must take a break and let the dittoheads and digg-patriots catch up with downvoting all my posts.