Fewer than ~22% are sticking with python 3. Admittedly that's more than 5%, but I'd hardly call it a blazing success story, when 60% of people have tried it.
So, 22% of 60% of people all up are sticking with python 3. 13%. Woo...
Where do you come up with 22% of 60% as sticking with it? The 22% I assume came from the question of which do you program in most. I program in Python 2 most currently too because of legacy projects. But I also do a lot in Python 3 as well, just not "most".
3 (distribute, zc.buildout and pip) only distribute non-version dependent files
leaving just 1 (lxml) with version dependent installers listed at all and it is only for the windows installers.
Drilling down into lxml, roughly 95% of its downloads are the version agnostic .tar.gz file. Also the version dependent installers do not include a 3.3 version but only 3.2 for python3. But even with only an installer for a old version of python3 available it still is >8% of version dependent downloads.
> Do you have dependencies keeping you on 2.x?
> Yes: 61.46%
> No: 38.54%
I know that's why I returned to 2 after trying 3. For example BeautifulSoup (HTML parsing/scraping) has only supported Python 3 since October '13. There was nothing wrong with 3, it was just dependency issues.
Plus, when 2.7 was released it was done with a promise of ~6 years of support[0] to aid in the transition to 3.x. I think the definition of success here needs to take that into account.
So, 22% of 60% of people all up are sticking with python 3. 13%. Woo...