To be fair, when you have ~dozen carrier strike groups and ~3'500 nukes and wish to be aggressive, any theory is about as sound as any other. Recall the "WMD" theory.
I'd argue that, realistically, there is far more utility to be gained from a much less aggressive posture.
Look at Somalia: a warlord world is one in which the warlords get huge slices — of a tiny pie.
I'd argue that, realistically, there is far more utility to be gained from a much less aggressive posture.
Look at Somalia: a warlord world is one in which the warlords get huge slices — of a tiny pie.
reply