Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Because it's blaming Polymarket for something not within its control, which is imprecise. TFA makes the same mistake, fwiw.




That's a minor flaw but the comment seems mostly correct.

It's almost like they were not going to pay up regardless.

Might as well have bet "doll hairs"…


They are paying up, just for the "no" outcome.

They ARE, or INTEND to? It's not Jan 31, 2026 yet, so, AFAICT, only the "Yes" option can be short-circuited if it occurs. They can't pay the "No" side until Feb 1, 2026, right?

Good point, so for completeness: They'll pay out either "Yes" or "No", but definitely not nobody or themselves (except if they're also "Yes" or "No" holders).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: