Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The latter part at least is true. Sending "grossly offensive" messages is illegal under the Malicious Communications Act 1988 and the Communications Act 2003, specifically Section 127:

> a person is guilty of an offence if he—

> (a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or

> (b)causes any such message or matter to be so sent.

I suspect the former is also true, but am not well-read in that area



The full wording of the text is:

> A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—

> [F1(a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,]

> [F1(b)causes such a message to be sent; or]

> (c)persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.


[flagged]


> “Grossly offensive” is absolutely not the same thing as “any message online that anyone could find insulting or offensive”.

There is no statutory definition of “grossly”, so in effect it is the same. There is prior art for it being interpreted incredibly widely.

Not to mention the other incredibly vague adjectives in the law.

> Correct

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html “Don’t be snarky”.


>> There is no statutory definition of “grossly”

If this concerns you I would advise not looking into pretty much any UK law which is full of subjective terms and ways to interpret them. The law isn’t an algorithm nor should it be. Just because you can’t understand how it works doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.


Sorry, that was a low shot, and not meant truthfully, but I just couldn’t resist making an offensive comment when the topic was “you can be arrested for offending someone”.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: