Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Apparently someone does. Activist investors are the reason for Google’s layoffs.


Citation (other than Business Insider) needed


How about the Wall Street Journal? https://www.wsj.com/articles/activist-investor-calls-on-goog...

Or The Guardian? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/15/major-inv...

> “We are writing to express our view that the cost base of Alphabet is too high and management needs to take aggressive action,” TCI wrote in the letter, signed by managing director Christopher Hohn. “The company has too many employees and the cost per employee is too high.”


What makes you think that TCI was the reason for the layoffs?



Your interpretation of these facts is rather loose.


How so? Here are the facts:

1. TCI writes a letter to Google saying that they should layoff employees.

2. A few weeks later, Google lays off employees.

3. Literally the day the Google layoffs are announced, TCI writes a letter to Google saying "I have appreciated our recent dialogue concerning Alphabet's cost base. I am encouraged to see that you are now taking some action to right size Alphabet's cost base and understand that it is never an easy decision to let people go."

How else should these facts be interpreted.


“Investor makes themselves feel more important than they actually are”


As unilateral self-aggrandizing.


I don't think you can really call it aggrandizing when you're able to CC Google's board and they'll actually read your letter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: