I find parts of your post quite offensive, to be honest, but let's have a debate anyway.
The way I see it is that my (and other's) interests are not aligned with yours.
You want a web that evolves quickly, I want a web that is not a constantly moving target.
You want one web engine implementation to rule them all, I want an open web where standards are respected, not constantly changed by a single conflicted (as in conflict of interests) actor, where multiple implementations can thrive and where users can still expect every website to work independently of the user agent they use.
The way I see it is that my (and other's) interests are not aligned with yours.
You want a web that evolves quickly, I want a web that is not a constantly moving target.
You want one web engine implementation to rule them all, I want an open web where standards are respected, not constantly changed by a single conflicted (as in conflict of interests) actor, where multiple implementations can thrive and where users can still expect every website to work independently of the user agent they use.
Is this enough for intellectual rigour?