Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | narcindin's commentslogin

We call them DJ's and many are quite famous.

DJs are rated on their ability to read the dancefloor and get people to dance.

Yes, well, that sounds exactly like the skillset of a meme creator in a slightly different form factor.

Most arguments against gen-AI are bad arguments - you can (and should) admit this even if you (like me) don't respect gen-AI.


I haven't stated anything about meme creators using AI, I just pointed out a DJ's skill isn't based on randomly playing songs.

I think a lot of people mean "Wedding DJ" or "Radio DJ".

However there is a whole small subculture around this. A friend would go hunting for records to sample in Charity shops for old vinyls (this was pre-ebay). This apparently is known a "Digging" and lot of Music Producers, DJs etc would do this to find samples for their sets/albums.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6aQgZFrVKE

Similar you have people using tracker software on old Amigas / Ataris to play sets.

e.g.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkTQ-15jGD0&list=RDCkTQ-15jG...


Oh. Why? I didn't see anybody arguing that DJing was random or unskilled.

Do you honestly believe that DJs, particularly the very famous ones, just play CDs?

Discussions about "DJs" are difficult because there's a WIDE range of skills behind what we call a DJ.

Yes, some have zero skill and will basically just show up with a pre-determined Spotify playlist. They won't even have mixing/transitions between songs.

Some are in the middle and will be able to do basic transitions between songs (ie, just simple beat matching) and know how to carry a vibe.

At the far end of the spectrum are actual composers that are effectively making new mixes of songs on the fly.

And so you have the problem where someone says "Being a DJ takes a lot of skill" because they're thinking of the last category, while the person hearing that message replies with "How does it take skill to just press Play?" because they're thinking of the first.



I think many of them don't even do that live anymore, as the entire set has been mixed upfront in order to preprogram visual/light/pyro effects. :-)

Sad to see Healthcare and government employment growth outpace everything else. If we're all nurses or regulators who will build our country?


The bigger concern is that we've steadily been going from a circa 4:1 ratio of worker to non-worker to closer to 2:1 ratio. For an economic system based on workers paying the way for non-workers that is toxic. We've royally screwed up immigration, which could have helped, so all we have left is hoping for a hail mary huge productive boost or might as well shut up shop and figure out a new model


Healthcare employment’s guaranteed to keep rising until they’ve soaked up all the would-be inheritance from the Boomers.

Millennials are a large cohort, too, so it may stay steadily high for a good long while after that, after perhaps a small dip for X. Depends how much money they have for the healthcare sector to scoop up. Savings-at-same-age has been really bad for them relative to boomers, so we’ll see. May see healthcare employment shrink even as need (sans the dollars to back it up) grows, next time a demographic “lump” gets old.


The general trend of government employment hasn't been all that exciting: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/07/what-the-...

But, yes, the plan does seem to be that we all go broke attempting to get health care.


Not sure why they bundled education and healthcare together. As far as higher education is concerned, the job market is terrible. Many state universities have hiring freeze as they are tightening belts due to the lost NSF and NIH fundings.


Welcome to Europe. As an example, in Spain, there are 500K more people living off the government than working in the private sector: https://theobjective.com/economia/macroeconomia/2024-09-16/a...


Bring your whole self to work, at this point, is the term you use to criticize this policy, not to describe it.

Maternity leave is a version of BYWSTW. As are PRIDE/ethnicity related activities as work. Should we jettison those?

I agree it can and is taken to far, but I'd prefer to read an article about actually navigating an office with different types of real people. For example, for example, thermostats preferences, volume preferences, "we a family/team" vs "just a job" preferences, etc.


That's not what the article is about.


Reminds me of a demo I played 10 years ago called swap box turbo. Designed for two players, it is a simple platformer where you and your partner swap positions and momentum every 3 seconds.

You can play it single player too and have an experience similar to this.

https://www.freeindiegam.es/2012/12/swap-box-turbo-nifflas/


Is it how many workers you have when you build that building


To be clear VTI is only US stocks and VEU is everything else. It is confusing because "Vanguard Total Stock Market" contains only United States equities.


"I'm going to just go ahead and say 'based', entirely on the premise, thank you."

Is how I initially read this.


The sentence is missing a load bearing comma!


Patrick Collison is from Ireland.


I would say this would have been nice to know ~20 years ago, but umm, it came out ~20 years ago. Ah well.

Perhaps I had to learn my lessons the hard way regardless


Owning ~.00001% of a company feels illusory to me, more difficult to intuit values. So would Nvidia share owners rather own all of Nvidia instead of all of Apple? I suspect not. The marginal buyer of nvidia is either: * MEGA-FOMO * Betting on the singularity * Momentum trading


>So would Nvidia share owners rather own all of Nvidia instead of all of Apple?

Personally? Absolutely.

Stocks trade on forward growth. Apple has been stalled out for years now, with total saturation in the smartphone market, and anemic services revenue.


Besides growth, Nvidia also has much higher profit margins. In Q1 2024, Apple's margins were 42% gross, 26% net, versus Nvidia's 78% gross, 57% net. May or may not be sustainable, but for now Nvidia's basically printing money.


Also Nvidia's capex is insanely low relative to the other big techs. They are literally printing money.


Out of curiosity, would your (or anyone else wanting to chime in) answer change if there was a qualifier that you had to buy today, and were not allowed to sell for 8 years?


>Out of curiosity, would your (or anyone else wanting to chime in) answer change if there was a qualifier that you had to buy today, and were not allowed to sell for 8 years?

Yes, even moreso. What is the bullish case for Apple? I love them to death, and am a total fanboy, but there is simply no arguement to be made for them growing beyond their current (correctly priced) value.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: